top of page

Learn
Educational hub
Why Footprints Differ
Legacy designs & brand IP; Size/geometry needs of micro vs. full-size optics; Recoil management / lug design; Slide width/length constraints.
Marcos La Porte
Nov 5, 20251 min read
The Big Ones (High-Level)
RMR-style: Very common for pistol micro-dots; multiple manufacturers produce optics compatible with this pattern. RMSc / Shield-style: Common on micro-compacts and slim pistols; popular for concealed carry. RMSc & RMS share hole spacing; adapters often cross-fit. Docter / European footprints: Legacy European style used on some optics and pistol cuts.
Marcos La Porte
Nov 5, 20251 min read
Micro-Compact Pistols & RMSc
RMSc became the go-to for many slimline pistols (for example, Hellcat OSP and several P365 variants). Verify if it’s true RMSc or a modified RMSc and whether a spacer/plate is recommended.
Marcos La Porte
Nov 5, 20251 min read
Plates vs. Direct Mount (Pros/Cons)
Direct mount: lowest height, strongest interface, fewer parts. Plate: flexible — one slide can accept multiple footprints via plates (e.g., Glock MOS). Slight height/weight penalty.
Marcos La Porte
Nov 5, 20251 min read
FAQ
Q: Can I mix an RMSc optic on an RMR plate? A: Not without a purpose-built adapter—hole spacing and lugs differ. Use an adapter designed for that pairing.
Marcos La Porte
Nov 5, 20251 min read
bottom of page

